0

Argumentative Essay (Idham)

There has been an accident in tol Jagorawi which include Ahmad Dhani which is Dul age 13, the third son of Ahmad Dhani. The accident happened on Tol Jagorawi at 00.45. Dul was driving towards Jakarta from Bogor.  The accident took life of 7 people that Dul hit in the other side of the lane. We as a group strongly disagreed that Dul’s father must be guilty for this accident.

Some say that the father of the son must be guilty for this accident by not taking care of his son properly but on our opinion is that Dul is 13 years old and that is old enough to know which one is correct and which one is wrong. His father actually doesn’t know that Dul was driving the car alone without the driver that he have, Dul’s driver was actually asked to get home early because the next day he have to go to bandung, in this kind of situation Dul must have understand that he cannot drive alone on the highway, and from what I think that Dul must have told his father that he is going to Jakarta by his own.  According to Jakarta Post, Dul was driving Mitsubishi Lancer sedan at a high speed toward Jakarta. From my opinion is that Dul supposed to understand his conditions that he is not big enough to drive a car and also he break the speed limit. The speed that Dul was hitting the divider of the highway at 105 KMH, and the limit of the highway is only 80 KMH, Dul must have understand what is he doing because he was driving at midnight and breaking the speed limit.

Some resources tells that Dul has a fake driving license and also ID, If we properly passed the driving test we must have realize about the speed limit and also understand the consequences of driving at high speeds. In Dul’s crash he killed 7 people. He was driving fast and then he went our of control and then he crashed into the barrier and the car jumped to the opposing lane and crash into a van which consist of 13 and 7 died. Some say that Dul survived because there is front airbags and side airbags.

In my opinion that Dul is supposed to be guilty not his father, because that dul is big enough to make decisions and to know which one is right and which one is wrong. Dul must have told his father that he is going to drive to Jakarta by him self so that his father know what is he doing. Maybe that he is also sleepy because it is midnight and he crash into the walls.

We strongly disagree that Dul’s father is guilty. The above evidence shows that actually Dul is the one that makes the mistake not his Father. Dul is guilty because he was driving in midnight and also he is breaking the speed limit. We as a group has come up with an opinion that Dul is actually big enough to make big decisions, so Dul is responsible of this accident. 



 
Copyright © Everest All games